Water Safety

2015 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: 98% OF PEOPLE ARE OPPOSED TO THE BURIAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE IN THE GREAT LAKES BASIN.

In January 2017, the Ontario Power Generation stated, "the public doesn’t really care about the proposal for the deep geologic repository (DGR)." This statement was made despite the fact that numerous organizations and individuals have spoken up against the proposed. DGR project.

Between 2012 and 2014, members of the public were allowed to submit comments on OPG’s DGR plan to the Joint Review Panel (JRP), the body tasked with assessing the project under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act which ultimately gave the project a stamp of approval in spring 2015.

From our experience working with the JRP, we know that the process was biased in favour of OPG from the start. As we have written elsewhere, the JRP allowed OPG to proceed with their plan despite huge problems and omissions in OPG’s case. Additionally, of the well over 500 comments submitted by individuals, environmental organizations, citizens’ groups, city councils of huge cities, and Indigenous organizations, among others, an astounding 98% were opposed to the project. Here are some examples from that 98%:

“The Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation strongly opposes the OPG-Deep Geological Repository Project. Water is our Mother Earth’s life blood. We are and always will fight to protect Water. To permit the burial of Radioactive Nuclear Waste right beside our Great Lakes goes against everything we believe in and is a crime against humanity.”

Chippewas of Georgina Island First Nation

 

“It is our responsibility, as citizens of the “Great Lakes State,” to be vigilant in protecting our most valuable natural resource --- our clean water. With an economy, reputation and livelihood that are all dependent on the health of the Great Lakes, it would not be prudent or wise to construct this underground nuclear storage facility that puts radioactive waste less than a mile from Lake Huron.”

Michigan League of Conservation Voters

 

“In order to protect the Great Lakes and its tributaries, Toronto City Council urge that neither this proposed nuclear waste repository near Kincardine, Ontario, nor any other underground nuclear waste repository, be constructed in the Great Lakes Basin, in Canada, or in the United States.”

Toronto City Council

The results of public consultation undertaken by the JRP are a strong indication that OPG lacks “social license” for the DGR project. Given that the current government has committed to more transparent, accountable environmental regulation, we hope that Environment Minister Catherine McKenna considers the strong, negative response to OPG’s plan in her future decisions regarding the DGR.

Share:

SOS Great Lakes Comments on OPG's Additional Information

After considering the Joint Review Panel Environmental Assessment Report for the Deep Geologic Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Waste, the Honourable Catherine McKenna requested additional information before making her environmental assessment decision. 

OPG had 11 months to respond to the Minister's request. In December 2016, they submitted their report. (To read the full report, click here.)

In January 2017, the CEAA "invite[d] the public, Indigenous groups, and governments to review and comment on the additional information [submitted by OPG]". 

On March 6, 2017, SOS Great Lakes submitted a thorough investigation of OPG's additional information.

The Submission: 

Our Submission to the Minister is comprised of commentary in chapter format relating each of the three primary questions sent to OPG by the Minister in February 2016. Each of our chapters has been written by one of our members. We have been assisted in our submission by Mr. John Jackson, hired through the CEAA Participant Funding Program, to prepare commentary on OPGs Cumulative Effects Analysis.

The topics discussed include: commentary on OPG’s Study of Alternate Locations, the Cumulative Effects Analysis of the DGR for L&ILW in Kincardine, in combination with 3 potential APM used fuel DGRs in the one of the communities of Huron- Kinloss, South Bruce, and Central Huron, and the OPG Mitigation Measures Report.

OPG Has Submitted a Flawed Environmental Assessment. In December 2016,

OPG has presented a deeply flawed addition to its deeply flawed Environmental Impact Statement. We urge the Minister to reject the EA for OPGs Deep Geologic Repository and to reject the licensing of the DGR at Kincardine.

To read the full submission, click here. 

Share: